invincibleasian
01-12 07:26 PM
Your H1b will be cancelled without prejudice. You can have only 1 typeof visa stamped on your passport
wallpaper and drug trafficking.
wo1olf
01-20 08:56 PM
When developping apps for mobile device, is it better to user multiple forms for the application differents screen or just use one form with panels instaed?
:puzzled:
:puzzled:
Blog Feeds
05-30 08:30 AM
The Supreme Court issued its decision in the Arizona business license/e-Verification law of 2007 and by a 5-3 margin has upheld the law. This is the law that allows the state to revoke business licenses for firms knowingly hiring unauthorized workers and also mandating all employers use E-Verify. This was always going to be an easier case for Arizona than the defense of its 2010 law. For one, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 which created the employer sanctions system, says that while states may not impose civil and criminal penalties on employers hiring unauthorized workers, it does...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
2011 anti-trafficking record in
GCKarma
07-18 11:09 AM
Guys,
Can we file I-485, after August 1 2007 and
before August 17 2007 (as I'm preparing my medicals).Is there a chance USCIS stop taking the application after July 31 2007 by giving some crap reason?Also I understand that filing fee is same for I-485 until August 17 2007.Is that true even for I-765 and I-131.Please clarify.
Can we file I-485, after August 1 2007 and
before August 17 2007 (as I'm preparing my medicals).Is there a chance USCIS stop taking the application after July 31 2007 by giving some crap reason?Also I understand that filing fee is same for I-485 until August 17 2007.Is that true even for I-765 and I-131.Please clarify.
more...
rayan
02-20 05:35 PM
I applied for H -1 extension regular processing in the month of sept 2009 in california service centre before expiration date of my H1-B(2010 Jan 22).I got RFE on DEC 18th asking for client and contractual agreements between client and vendors and i got time til Jan 29th 2010 to reply back to RFE.As i was preparing to collect all the documents to respond to my RFE ,I also applied new H 1 from same existing employer before Jan22nd 2010 in Vermont service centre.I replied back to RFE on jan 27th 2010 with client letters and letters from 2 vendors.
I got my H 1-b extension approved from California service centre on Feb 18th 2010
My question is what if my new H1 filed in vermont service centre gets rejected.Will it cause any problems to the extension that was approved.I already got my h1-b extension approval notice from uscis on FEB 18th 2010.I have'nt heard anything about my new h1 b filed on jan 21 2010 in vermont service centre.Can i continue to work on my approved extension.
Please advice me
I got my H 1-b extension approved from California service centre on Feb 18th 2010
My question is what if my new H1 filed in vermont service centre gets rejected.Will it cause any problems to the extension that was approved.I already got my h1-b extension approval notice from uscis on FEB 18th 2010.I have'nt heard anything about my new h1 b filed on jan 21 2010 in vermont service centre.Can i continue to work on my approved extension.
Please advice me
eyeongc
11-29 09:37 PM
Gurus,
First of all apologies if this has been asked before (in that case will appreciate if someone can post the link or keywords to search for).
Looks like it will be a long wait for many of us to get green card. Was wondering if there are any state/federal college plans or something similar which allows non-immigrants to participate. If not, are there any equivalent private plans available. I'm sure any inputs will help.
Thanks
First of all apologies if this has been asked before (in that case will appreciate if someone can post the link or keywords to search for).
Looks like it will be a long wait for many of us to get green card. Was wondering if there are any state/federal college plans or something similar which allows non-immigrants to participate. If not, are there any equivalent private plans available. I'm sure any inputs will help.
Thanks
more...
Munshi75
11-09 05:57 PM
you should have your I-140 approved to claim your previous PD for future LC.
2010 These graphs are the best way
txj1012
09-28 11:31 AM
My background:
1. Got Ph.D three years ago
2. worked in a hospital as a PI and postdoc training for three years
3. worked as research associate at University of Houston last year
4. working as research assistant professor(Faculty) at UH
5. Four foreign grants including national grant
6. several awards including the First Prize awards in foreign provincial health field
7. Published more than 20 papers, only two are SCI (one is PNAS published this year without citation so far), others are foreign language papers have more than 40 citations.
Now I am preparing files and will apply as EB-1b.
can you tell me the best points to claim?
I will tell you any progress in the coming days. Thanks forum friends.
1. Got Ph.D three years ago
2. worked in a hospital as a PI and postdoc training for three years
3. worked as research associate at University of Houston last year
4. working as research assistant professor(Faculty) at UH
5. Four foreign grants including national grant
6. several awards including the First Prize awards in foreign provincial health field
7. Published more than 20 papers, only two are SCI (one is PNAS published this year without citation so far), others are foreign language papers have more than 40 citations.
Now I am preparing files and will apply as EB-1b.
can you tell me the best points to claim?
I will tell you any progress in the coming days. Thanks forum friends.
more...
zCool
04-01 07:19 PM
No it should not matter.
TAL security checks are done at the time of Visa issuance.. COS you are already in
TAL security checks are done at the time of Visa issuance.. COS you are already in
hair Maps and Graphs
Ajaykumar
11-12 11:57 PM
Hi All,
Case:EB3
Priority Date: Sep 2004
Status: Labor & I-140 approved
EB2: Labor got approved November 2009.
I'm trying to file 1-140 amendment with EB3 priority date. Currently i'm thinking of going with Sheela Murthy/Rajiv Khanna,
could you please suggest some good attorney who can handle my case very well in a limited time? Thanks a lot and really
appreciate your help.
Regards,
Ajay
Case:EB3
Priority Date: Sep 2004
Status: Labor & I-140 approved
EB2: Labor got approved November 2009.
I'm trying to file 1-140 amendment with EB3 priority date. Currently i'm thinking of going with Sheela Murthy/Rajiv Khanna,
could you please suggest some good attorney who can handle my case very well in a limited time? Thanks a lot and really
appreciate your help.
Regards,
Ajay
more...
ParanoidAndroid
02-25 08:33 PM
you want to learn how to use 3d programs..or just swift3d?
try here 3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/ (http://3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/)
try here 3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/ (http://3dgraphics.about.com/cs/3dtutorials/)
hot (see trend graphs below)
bijualex29
09-13 03:43 PM
I do not think, we need to break our head against House repulican, they are so bias in their thinking and approch.
I think, senate version will have some chance of incorporating SKILL bill, since they are usually broad minded and willing to listern.
I think, senate version will have some chance of incorporating SKILL bill, since they are usually broad minded and willing to listern.
more...
house Human trafficking graph in the philippines
anilsal
11-06 11:10 AM
Email: il@immigrationvoice.org
tattoo more than 30% of total
Blog Feeds
08-12 09:50 AM
The US Chamber of Commerce is seeking a review by the nation's highest court of the Arizona law that calls for the revocation of business licenses for employers found to have knowingly hired illegally present immigrants and also mandates all employers in the state use E-Verify. The case could settle the basic question of what authority a state or local government has in regulating immigration.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/us-chamber-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-arizona-employer-sanctions-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/us-chamber-seeks-supreme-court-review-of-arizona-employer-sanctions-law.html)
more...
pictures Graph 1--FTEs by Fiscal Year
Macaca
12-07 10:30 AM
Holding the Hungry Hostage (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/opinion/07fri2.html) NY Editorial, December 7, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
dresses graph 1: Principle Supported
kirupa
03-24 03:38 AM
Added :)
more...
makeup Financial and human resources
sweet_jungle
02-08 03:12 AM
yes. it can be done inside USA by filing I-539.
The school must first issue I-20. Then, you can file I-539 with the INS by attaching the I-20.
INS will approve it and return you I-20 along with a new I-94.
The school must first issue I-20. Then, you can file I-539 with the INS by attaching the I-20.
INS will approve it and return you I-20 along with a new I-94.
girlfriend traffick human trafficking graph in the philippines
rajasagar
03-10 01:23 AM
Hi,
My H1 was filed as an individual application while i was in India last year by a consulting company.Later in May 2007 i was transfered to US on L1B.
Since then i'm in US and now i have taken a vacation off, and during this i wish to appear for H1 stamping interview.
Supposedly i get my H1 visa stamped, i am hoping i will be able to travel to US but that will be on H1 with a new Employer, but i should be resigning with the old company once i reach there. (Please correct if this legal because my old company still thinks i am on L1)
And other hand if i'm not able to make it through stamping, my old L1 status is still valid ?
Please clarify the above doubts ...!!
Thanks for your time...!!
My H1 was filed as an individual application while i was in India last year by a consulting company.Later in May 2007 i was transfered to US on L1B.
Since then i'm in US and now i have taken a vacation off, and during this i wish to appear for H1 stamping interview.
Supposedly i get my H1 visa stamped, i am hoping i will be able to travel to US but that will be on H1 with a new Employer, but i should be resigning with the old company once i reach there. (Please correct if this legal because my old company still thinks i am on L1)
And other hand if i'm not able to make it through stamping, my old L1 status is still valid ?
Please clarify the above doubts ...!!
Thanks for your time...!!
hairstyles of human trafficking,
LOL123
10-21 02:41 PM
I am a dependent to the primary applicant of 485. i am planning to change my status from H1 to EAD. what is the procedure. Do I need to inform any one?
lecter
January 17th, 2005, 08:38 AM
I've done a few already... let me pick the first one without a comment....
tick tick..
Rob
tick tick..
Rob
solaris27
01-31 10:04 AM
i got in 2-3 days
No comments:
Post a Comment